Thursday, September 13, 2012

Wanted by the FBI


Bank Robbery; Unlawful Flight to Avoid Prosecution - Armed Robbery; Theft From Interstate Shipment

VICTOR MANUEL GERENA

Subject ImageSubject ImageSubject Image
Photograph taken in 1983Photograph retouched in 2004Computer Age Enhanced Photograph

Aliases:

Victor Ortiz, Victor M. Gerena Ortiz

DESCRIPTION

Date(s) of Birth Used:

June 24, 1958

Place of Birth:

New York, New York

Height:

5'6" to 5'7"

Weight:

160 to 169 pounds

Build:

Medium/Stocky

Occupations:

Machinist,
Security Guard

Hair:

Brown

Eyes:

Green

Complexion:

Dark/Medium

Sex:

Male

Race:

White (Hispanic)

Nationality:

American (Puerto Rican descent)

Scars and Marks:

Gerena has a one-inch scar and a mole on his right shoulder blade.

Remarks:

None

CAUTION

Victor Manuel Gerena is being sought in connection with the armed robbery of approximately $7 million from a security company in Connecticut in 1983. He allegedly took two security employees hostage at gunpoint and then handcuffed, bound and injected them with an unknown substance in order to further disable them.

REWARD

The FBI is offering a reward of up to $1 million for information leading directly to the arrest of Victor Manuel Gerena.

CONSIDERED ARMED AND EXTREMELY DANGEROUS

If you have any information concerning this person, please contact your local FBI office or the nearest American Embassy or Consulate.
Field Offices: New HavenSan Juan

30-Year-Old Murder Solved

fbi.gov


30-Year-Old Murder Solved
Fingerprint Technology Played Key Role
09/11/12
A cold case is just that—an investigation of a crime, usually a violent one, where all leads have been exhausted and the trail has gone cold. But in recent years, the use of various technologies has begun heating up many of these cold cases, uncovering new leads for investigators and providing justice for victims.
One immediate technology example that comes to mind is automated fingerprint searching—more precisely, searches of latent prints of violent unknown perpetrators left at crime scenes. The FBI’s Integrated Automated Fingerprint Identification System (IAFIS), which houses known records for approximately 73 million criminal subjects, is used daily by local, state, tribal, and international law enforcement for current cases, but increasingly for help in solving cold cases as well. And once a year, the Bureau’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division recognizes an outstanding major case solved with help from IAFIS.

IAFIS

The Latest on Latents
Latent prints are impressions—usually invisible to the naked eye—often left at crime scenes that are produced by the ridged skin on human fingers, palms, or soles of the feet. The FBI’s IAFIS receives an average of 700 latent search requests per day from authorized law enforcement agencies…with an average response time of one hour.
Our Next Generation Identification system, an incremental replacement of today’s IAFIS, will specifically focus on the latent user community next March when a National Palmprint System (NPPS) is scheduled to be established. The NPPS will create a centralized repository of known palmprints within the FBI’s database, allowing searches of unknown palmprints against the repository…as well as searches of known palmprints against the Unsolved Latent File. Both types of searches will enhance law enforcement’s ability to identify criminal and terrorist suspects.

The 2012 Latent Hit of the Year Award was presented last month to two employees of the Omaha Police Department—Detective Douglas Herout and Senior Crime Laboratory Technician Laura Casey—for their efforts to identify the man responsible for a brutal murder more than 30 years ago.
The crime: In 1978, 61-year-old Carroll Bonnet was stabbed to death in his apartment. Police collected evidence, including latent fingerprints and palmprints from the victim’s bathroom (officers believed the killer was trying to wash off blood and other evidence before leaving the apartment). The victim’s car was then stolen.
The investigation: The car was found in Illinois, but after collecting additional latent prints, investigators couldn’t develop any new leads. The crime scene evidence was processed, and latent prints recovered from the scene and the car were searched against local and state fingerprint files. Investigators also sent fingerprint requests to agencies outside Nebraska, but no matches were returned and the case soon went cold.
The re-investigation: In late 2008, the Omaha Police Department received an inquiry on the case, prompting technician Laura Casey to search the prints against IAFIS (which didn’t exist in 1978). In less than five hours, IAFIS returned possible candidates for comparison purposes. Casey spent days carefully examining the prints and came up with a positive identification—Jerry Watson, who was serving time in an Illinois prison on burglary charges.
The case was officially re-opened and assigned to the cold case squad’s Doug Herout. Working with laboratory technicians and analysts, Herout reviewed the original evidence from the case, including a classified advertisement flyer with “Jerry W.” scribbled on one of the pages. Herout also discovered that Jerry Watson had lived only a few blocks from where the victim’s car was recovered.
And the discovery was made just in time—Watson was just days away from being released from prison.
Herout traveled to Illinois to question Watson and presented him with an order to obtain a DNA sample. Subsequent testing determined that Watson’s DNA matched DNA recovered at the crime scene, a finding that—combined with Watson’s identified prints—resulted in murder charges and a conviction. On October 17, 2011—33 years to the day that Bonnet’s body was discovered—his killer was sentenced to life in prison.
It’s yet another example of the vital role that technology plays in getting dangerous criminals off our streets.

How to Prevent Crying When Taking Away the Pacifier

United States of America


Despite its diminutive size, the pacifier has been the subject of some pretty big debate; some parents and caregivers theorize that pacifier use, even during infancy, can negatively affect the formation of teeth and mouth shape, while proponents hold steady on their value as a soothing device. The American Academy of Pediatrics has even weighed in, stating that their research indicates a marked decrease in the rate of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome among infants that sleep with a pacifier. Whether a pacifier was introduced to your child solely as a comfort object or as a means of reducing SIDS risk, there comes a time when weaning can no longer be delayed. The process of breaking a child from his “binky,” however, can be fraught with hysterics and sleep deprivation for both parents and children alike. While the task of weaning is rarely an easy one to accomplish, these hints can help to soothe the worst of Baby’s anxiety.
  • Make the Cut – Cutting the rubber tip off of your child’s pacifier alters the way that it feels and reduces its appeal dramatically for most children; while they may feel a bit of confusion about the changes in their prized paci, learning to self-soothe without it is much easier when the pacifier no longer offers the same level of comfort. Be sure to get rid of all the pacifiers except his favorite, and cut the tip off completely to prevent any risk of choking. Explaining to your puzzled little one that his pacifier is “broken” may help him to understand that it can’t be fixed, and is no longer of much value. If you choose this method, don’t attempt to take the mutilated pacifier away; he’ll most likely tire of it on his own and lose interest without a tantrum.
  • Bring in a Substitute – Substituting one comfort object for another isn’t always a great idea because it can cause a child to simply transfer his feelings of dependency to the new object when the anxiety of losing his pacifier sets in. Rather than designate one object as special, alternate blankets and other soothing objects that can ease his transition without keeping one particular item in circulation for too long. When bringing a specific object to bed is no longer part of his bedtime routine, eliminating comfort items altogether can be easier.
  • Step Up the Soothing and Comforting Routine – If your little one has used a pacifier since the day he came home from the hospital, the transition to binky-free life is bound to be a confusing and scary one for him. The sheer anxiety that accompanies an abrupt shift in the structure of his everyday life can greatly contribute to his difficulty sleeping and irritability during the weaning period, so be sure to allot extra time for comforting words and plenty of cuddling and soothing before bed.
  • One Day at a Time – For some kids weaning comes easily and is done over the course of a day or two. The majority of children, however, react with a mixture of anger, confusion, and something akin to grief. Realizing that Rome wasn’t built in a day and that your child probably won’t be weaned from his pacifier in one is the best approach; be prepared to gradually break him of the pacifier habit, rather than throwing them all away in a grand gesture and forbidding them re-entry to the home.
  • Rewards and Praise – By the time that pacifier weaning becomes a serious issue for most parents, their children are edging into toddlerhood, and thus are capable of understanding verbal praise, rewards for good behavior, and that these things happen as a result of following instructions “like a big kid.” Every time that your child naps without his paci or completes other tasks, be sure to praise him effusively and let him know that you’re proud of his efforts.
  • Patience is a Virtue – If your child is firmly attached to his pacifier as a comfort object, even the best method of weaning will just reduce his anxiety, rather than eliminating it altogether. Realistically, he will almost certainly cry and become angry until he understands that his distress doesn’t deliver his pacifier back and he learns to self-soothe without it. Keeping a firm grip on your patience and working with him through the process to minimize his stress is the most effective way of weaning; unreasonable and unrealistic expectations will only come back to haunt you both. 
If your child simply isn’t adjusting to the weaning process and is showing no progress in controlling his tantrums or self-soothing, discussing alternate weaning methods with his pediatrician might give you some more insight.



Molly Cunningham

The Freedom Between Your Ears

Buhl, Idaho

Two major issues frighten me in this year’s Presidential election. One is, with Romney, we will all be able to afford wine, but we won’t be allowed to actually drink it without getting thrown in jail.
With Obama, phase #1 is, we won’t be able to afford beer, let alone wine, and will be thrown in jail if we attempt to brew our own. Phase #2 is: Once the government takes over the vineyards and breweries, then we can buy a license to drink, but only if we sign up for welfare, and even then, we’ll be on a ration.
All things considered, those are pretty scary thoughts. The Obama administration (if you want to call it that) has made more republican bar owners out of former democrat bar owners than Tricky Dicky made votes from former Vietnam era draftees. (Ya gotta be old to get that one.)
Mitt is a financial whiz kid who surrounds himself with fellow financial whiz kids, and of course will carry Idaho in a landslide. You don’t have to be much of a prognosticator to figure than one out. Today I got an email that listed the enterprises of Romney versus Obama. The two lists read like this:
Romney’s pet enterprises: AMC Entertainment, Burger King, Burlington Coat Factory, Clear Channel Communications, Domino’s Pizza, Dunkin’ Donuts, Guitar Center, The Sports Authority, Staples, Toys Are Us, and Warner Music Group. All of these are apparently still sailing.
To Obama’s credit, he has: Solyndra, Ener 1, Beacon Power, Abound Solar, Omonix Solar, Spectra Watt, and Eastern Energy. “All of these are bankrupt,” stated the email, “and were started by Obama campaign contributors.”
Many a political prognosticator has proclaimed that America can’t survive four more years of Obama. I disagree. We should put this national debt into perspective, be optimistic, and smile.
Those who follow this column know that two of my favorite topics are politics and religion.
We all know that Obama claims Christianity as his primary religion. Many are skeptical about that, and believe him to be a Muslim. I don’t know for sure one way or the other. I can’t speak for the Obamanites; I can only speak for myself.
Politically, I list my religion as Baptist, in order to avoid being an embarrassment to any other church. The Baptists are a free spirited bunch, and prone to think outside of other people’s buns.
Avant! Back to the issue at hand! Can America survive four more years of Obama? Of course we can! As mentioned, all we need to do is put America’s massive debt into perspective, so please let me help you Romneyites out in that department.
I checked the Debt Clock Online this morning. It is fast approaching 16 trillion dollars, and will likely be beyond that by the time this column makes press.
Nobody knows who will win the Presidential election, or if it will even be close. Either way, the debt will still be there, we all know that. And to let people know how this can be viewed from a common Christian perspective, please take time to consider:
If you went to the Catholics and asked, “Would you sell your church for sixteen trillion dollars to pay off the national debt?” The Catholics would promptly reply, “This is God’s Church and it ain’t for sale.”
If you went to the Mormons and asked, “Would you sell your church for sixteen trillion dollars to pay off the national debt?” The Mormons would promptly reply, “This is God’s Church and it ain’t for sale.”
If you went to the Baptists and asked, “Would you sell your church for sixteen trillion?” The Baptists would have to call a prayer meeting at Smokey’s Bar, and when they came out, would promptly proclaim, “Hell yes! Fifteen trillion would get us close enough to out of debt, and we’d still have a trillion left over to spend on beer and race cars!”

Jack W. Chappell

www.futurityartswest.com

What Should a Nanny Do If Her Boss is Upset with Her?


You might be the best nanny that your employer has ever engaged, your charges may think that you’re the best thing since peanut butter and jelly, you may be willing to perform the occasional non-childcare related tasks, and you might hold a college degree in childhood development or education. No matter how competent and qualified you are, there will inevitably come a time when you’re not quite in your employer’s good graces; no one can perform flawlessly all the time, and tempers can be notoriously short when parents are resentful of the time that they’re forced to spend away from their children. Rather than panicking and putting out feelers for a new post, consider your options and the best methods for salvaging your existing engagement.

  • Realize That These Things Are Rarely Permanent – Unless you’ve committed a major transgression, the chances of your employer resorting to drastic disciplinary measures are fairly slim. Provided that you’ve been an otherwise good employee, most parents would rather resolve an existing problem than take on the Herculean task of sorting through dozens of resumes and conducting nerve-wracking, tedious interviews. That being said, it’s not wise to be too secure in your position; if you’re overly cocky and consistently go against their wishes your employers will eventually have all that they can take.
  • Confront the Issue Head-On – If you know that your employer is angry but haven’t been approached with a reprimand or a request for an explanation, it’s best to take the bull by the horns and approach her with your concerns. It’s especially smart to make an effort to mend fences if you know why your employer is upset and agree that you are in the wrong. Letting the situation go unacknowledged for too long can cause resentment to build up and exacerbate the problem, so don’t dodge your employer in hopes that things will blow over.
  • Be Honest – Should your employer confront you with questions about an incident in which you know you were in the wrong, don’t give into the temptation to cover your tracks. Admitting that you were wrong and are willing to accept any penalties as a result of your poor choices shows strong character and moral fiber; in addition to being the right thing to do, it may also impress your employer enough that they second-guess their outrage.
  • Keep Your Own Temper in Check – Being accused of misconduct, whether you’re guilty or innocent, is enough to put almost anyone on the defensive. Taking this tack with your employers as a reaction to questioning or accusations will only escalate the situation, and perhaps lead to the loss of a post that you would otherwise have been able to retain. Remember the old adage about flies and honey and realize that anger, even of the righteous variety, will get you nowhere in these situations.
  • Accept Responsibility For Your Actions – Attempting to pass the buck, or blame someone else for your failure to perform properly or your momentary lapse in judgment, isn’t likely to endear you to your already-upset employers; instead face the consequences of a poor choice as gracefully as possible. Whining or shifting blame isn’t just ineffective, it’s often downright counterproductive.
  • Make a Concerted Effort to Make Up – It’s easy to hold your breath and hope that a tumultuous period in your relationship with your employer will pass without any attempts to mend fences on your part, but that’s almost never the case. Extending the olive branch isn’t always the easiest thing to do, especially if you feel that you have nothing to apologize for; still, preserving that relationship, and perhaps your post itself, may depend upon your ability to do just that.
  • Keep the Conversation Behind Closed Doors – Your charges, your friends, and other nannies at the playground don’t need to hear you air your grievances or discuss an ongoing problem you have with your employer. Even in the largest, most densely populated cities, most social circles are relatively small and people will talk. Letting news of your woes get back to your employers is a surefire way to make them give up on you altogether, so make sure that you keep any and all conversations about the state of your relationship with your employers and the details surrounding it away from the public eye.

Depending upon the severity of your mistake and the potential repercussions, you may want to consider the possibility that your job could be in danger, though it’s not altogether likely in most cases. To help prevent similar situations in the future, make it a habit to come clean with mistakes as soon as they happen, rather than waiting with bated breath for them to be found out.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Buhl Will Vote Tuesday Aug 28th

SAMPLE BALLOT BUHL LEVY ELECTION

Tuesday Aug 28th, 8 am to 8 pm


Polling Places For Buhl School Election


Buhl 1, 2 Buhl Moose Hall, 1101 Main Street, Buhl

Buhl 3-5 First Christian Church, 1005 Poplar Street, Buhl

Deep Creek Buhl Fire Department – Station #2, 19266A Highway 30, Buhl